Main Menu

Midcoast Hospitality House to reopen after sudden closure PDF Print
December 27, 2012

by Chris Chase
Coastal Journal staff

ROCKPORT — The Midcoast Hospitality House, a homeless shelter that was closed without warning recently, will live again under the direction of the Maine State Housing Authority (MSHA).

The shelter, which is located in Rockport, was shuttered with little notice from its manager, Gordon Manks, who thus far has been unavailable for comment on the issue. However, according to Debra Turcotte, communications director for the MSHA, there has since been some contact with the Manks on their end. 

“We have been talking with the Manks, and things have been going really well,” said Turcotte.

The shelter, which closed some time late November, was one of few in the area that offered housing for the homeless. The MSHA sees that service as a valuable resource and plans on getting the shelter up and running as soon as possible. 

“A number of homeless service providers in the area have been helping those in need since the shelter has closed,” said Turcotte. “We are working with a number of service providers in the area to get the shelter property back open.”

Although the circumstances surrounding the closure have been hazy at best, Turcotte says it was not done out of malice, and that the Manks have been cooperative with the MSHA.

“From our understanding they had done all that they could, and they needed to step away,” said Turcotte. 

The shelter, according to their tax forms, was still financially viable and was still serving the community. However, around the time of the closure, the shelter started to turn people away in order to phase out their services. 

“They were not accepting any new people into the shelter, but were trying to find homes for the people that were in there and help them before their closing date,” said Turcotte. 

With rumors swirling about the possibility of foul play, Turcotte is adamant about asserting that there has been no indication or evidence of any wrongdoing or lack of oversight. 

“We have no indication of any wrongdoing there. The mortgage was paid on time. The paperwork for reimbursement was filed on time,” said Turcotte. “We have no reason to believe there was any financial wrongdoing at the shelter.”

According to Turcotte, the shelter is required to go through a rigorous set of checks to ensure that the funding they were receiving from the MSHA was going toward its intended purpose. 

“You would be required to sign a form with your Social Security number when you came in. They would then put your information into the homeless management information database,” said Turcotte. “Every quarter, homeless shelters in Maine send us information on the people that they've helped. We check in to make sure that everything matches up. They don't get the money if the forms don't match up.”

Although the MSHA would rather have had the Manks communicate with them at an earlier time, so far everything has indicated that the Manks were planning on phasing out the shelter for awhile.

“What we have come to find out, is that he was helping people that were already in there and was not letting any more people in,” said Turcotte. 

For now the Hospitality House remains shuttered. The MSHA has no definitive date for its reopening, but so far, according to Turcotte, all indications point to it being reopened soon. 

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Jake Racko, December 28, 2012
This is some interesting soft-peddling.
"Although the MSHA would rather have had the Manks communicate with them at an earlier time, so far everything has indicated that the Manks were planning on phasing out the shelter for awhile." The Manks did not own the shelter. There was a Board of Directors, if in name only. This reads as though Hospitality House belonged to the Manks. Not the case.

As to finances, the MSHA seems satisfied that the paperwork for reimbursement was filed and the mortgage paid. What services were provided, and how they were provided, not so much.
...
written by Jake Racko, December 29, 2012
A whole lot of soft-peddling here, as well as misinformation.

"...the Manks were planning on phasing out the shelter for awhile." This makes it sound as though the Manks owned and operated the shelter, and were not the hired hands of a Board of Directors.

There are few organizations I know of that have operated so oddly, so content with a status quo for so long. So unaccountable.


Were the Manks the ones who wrote the checks for the mortgage, or was that a Board Member?
There's more to wrongdoing than the financial end of things. What about service provision? What about having people, even people with children, leave the shelter for the entire day - to go to ???


Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

...